Knowledge translation in psychological interventions for pediatric pain: Bridging the gap between research and practice
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is now firmly understood that a child’s response to pain is not simply a direct result of the level of tissue damage, but rather a combination of both physical and psychological variables. Establishing the multiple dimensions of the pain experience has served as an important first step in advancing the role of pediatric psychology in pain management (Kazdin & Kendall, 1998). Subsequent research has built upon this foundation and produced an array of psychological strategies to help children cope with their pain. Many cognitivebehavioral strategies have been deemed effective in managing both acute procedural pain (e.g. distraction, hypnosis, and guided imagery; Uman et al., 2006) and chronic or recurrent pain (e.g. multicomponent cognitive-behavioral treatment packages; Dahlquist & Switkin, 2003). Despite advances in the development of psychological interventions for pediatric pain management, research continues to suggest that evidence-based techniques remain relatively unused in clinical practice, and that children’s pain continues to be undertreated. While part of the problem is the continued use of specific flawed approaches (e.g. reassurance; McMurtry et al., 2006), the majority of research findings indicate that some children are simply not provided adequate management of their pain (Cummings et al., 1996; Ellis et al., 2002) and that many pediatric hospitals continue to use outdated or unsupported pain intervention programs (e.g. O’Byrne et al., 1997). The objective of this commentary is to identify some of the barriers in successfully translating psychological interventions from research to clinical practice, as well as to offer suggestions for bridging this gap. While psychological interventions may vary depending upon the type of pain (e.g. acute, chronic, injury-related, disease-related, postoperative), the purpose of the current commentary is to discuss the lack of knowledge translation for pediatric pain management in general, rather than knowledge translation issues related to specific strategies.
منابع مشابه
Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy and Practice; Comment on “CIHR Health System Impact Fellows: Reflections on ‘Driving Change’ Within the Health System”
Far too often, there is a gap between research and policy and practice. Too much research is undertaken with little relevance to real life problems or its reported in ways that are obscure and impenetrable. At the same time, many policies are developed and implemented but are untouched by, or even contrary to evidence. An accompanying paper describes an innovative progr...
متن کاملنظریه پردازی بر فرآیند انتقال دانش نظری به حوزه عمل در پرستاری: رویکرد گراندد تئوری
Introduction & Objective: Knowledge transfer and in fact, the bridging of theory and practice is one of the main concerns of all academic disciplines. Getting prominent professional status is the thing that can be achieved by knowledge-based function, and of which would be called as successful discipline that it be able to transfer its theoretical paradigmatic claims into practice. Accordingly,...
متن کاملIt Is Not That Simple nor Compelling!; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
Healthcare decisions are often made under pressure, with varying levels of information in a changing clinical context. With limited resources and a focus on improving patient outcomes, healthcare managers and health professionals strive to implement both clinical and cost-effective care. However, the gap between research evidence and health policy/clinical practice persists despite our best eff...
متن کاملBridging the ‘Two Cultures’ of Research and Service: Can Complexity Theory Help?; Comment on “Experience of Health Leadership in Partnering With University-Based Researchers in Canada – A Call to ‘Re-imagine’ Research”
This commentary addresses Bowen et al’s empirical study of perspectives of Canadian healthcare staff towards research and their call for multi-faceted action to improve misalignments in the system. This commentary argues that tensions and misalignments between research and service are inherent and can never be eradicated. Building on previous work by Lanham et al, I pro...
متن کاملFrom Knowing to Doing—From the Academy to Practice; Comment on “The Many Meanings of Evidence: Implications for the Translational Science Agenda in Healthcare”
In this commentary, the idea of closing the gap between knowing and doing through closing the gap between academics and practitioners is explored. The two communities approach to knowledge production and use, has predominated within healthcare, resulting in a separation between the worlds of research and practice, and, therefore, between its producers and users. Meaningful collaborations betwee...
متن کامل